This question is one I have heard countless of times (along with: Who really needs to study medieval history? But that one is a subject for another time). I do not intend to give a full and satisfactory answer, for my focus is going to be on my views and why I think book history is an important discipline.
History is, in essence, stories. Those stories are told over and over again. One key feature about stories is that they spread the ideas within them. Thus, ideas move through humanity via stories. While the most common way to tell a story is orally, the most enduring one is text. Today, ideas spread through internet, social media and other electronic devices. It might appear that no one reads physical texts anymore. Well, before the digital age, information and ideas had to be transferred usually via written texts. And before the newspaper industry, that format was a book, or a codex.
Studying a copy of Decades in the Biblioteca Angelica in Rome last June. |
Book history studies the books as vessels which transmit ideas among humans. Well, at least in one sense. It also studies the book itself, its dimensions, structure, material, writing, layout etc. Just like scholars who study social media platforms and newspapers, book historians study the book. The physical appearance of a book can tell us much about the technology of the period when the book was made. It can also help in locating the origin of a book, whether it is a manuscript or a printed book. The used writing material informs us what kind of animal skins were used, whether some animals were popular in specific regions etc. Moreover, finding a watermark in a paper manuscript can point to a specific paper manufacturer revealing important information of the paper trade.